Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.E. Petersen's avatar

I'm one of those people who recommends classics, but never at the expense of enjoyment. If a book starts to feel like a chore, it's time to stop reading it. Maybe it'll feel different later! But life's way, way, way too short to waste any of it on books that don't give exponentially more than they take. Which is why I find myself returning to fiction more and more often. A good storyteller endows his or her work with its own gravity -- it doesn't take much effort for a reader to tip past the event horizon and fall in.

Also, it's been my experience that classics are classics for a reason. My mom recommended Steinbeck's East of Eden to me for YEARS back when I was in college before I finally cracked it open. Once I did, I was hooked. Since then, I've read it three more times. It's my favorite book. Before that, it was David Copperfield.

I'm not suggesting that everyone will love a so-called classic work of literature, but I wouldn't read them if they didn't pull me in. And I think a lot of people end up being surprised at how exceptionally entertaining old classics are. I read Anne of Green Gables when I was 30 and laughed until I cried.

Expand full comment
Books on GIF's avatar

Thanks for this. I completely agree! So much can be learned from fiction. It can enrich the soul. Also it’s fun.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts